Why are Humans Susceptible to Magical Thinking?
Welcome to today's post about the mind. Where I'll discuss different aspects that are related to the confusing, pink sacks of knowledge in our heads.
Today, I want to know why humans are so susceptible to magical thinking? Why is it, that when reason can't be found, we go straight toward the paranormal to find answers? Is it just something we've always had in us, or does it stem from some kind of exterior force? Let's find out.
Here are some possible explanations for the main findings.
Dualism was the strongest predictor of the three types of
supernatural belief. It’s the foundation for belief in God, a disembodied mind.
It’s also necessary for belief in spirits, part of the paranormal package. And
it may encourage belief in life’s purpose because people see disembodied
intentionality acting everywhere, or because belief in the afterlife enhances
life’s meaning.
Teleology leads to belief in life’s purpose when one turns
the process on oneself. It may lead to belief in God when one supposes God as
the source of all the perceived purposefulness. And it could encourage
paranormal belief if one supposes the source of purpose to be a spirit or a
witch or the telekinetic powers of someone who has read The Secret.
Today, I want to know why humans are so susceptible to magical thinking? Why is it, that when reason can't be found, we go straight toward the paranormal to find answers? Is it just something we've always had in us, or does it stem from some kind of exterior force? Let's find out.
In recent years, psychologists have come to understand
religion and paranormal belief as resulting, in most people, from simple errors
in reasoning. You believe in God or astrology or a purpose in life because you
apply ideas about people - that they have thoughts and intentions - to the natural
world. Some display this tendency more than others, but it’s there in everyone,
even agnostic heathens like me (atheists too). What has not been clarified is exactly how the
various cognitive biases interact to produce specific ideas about the
supernatural - until now.
In the November 2013 issue of Cognition, Aiyana Willard and
Ara Norenzayan of the University of British Columbia report on the relative
influence of three cognitive tendencies on three types of supernatural belief,
as well as the role of cultural influence.
Several studies show that people who think more intuitively
are also more susceptible to magical thinking. One intuition that’s been
proposed as a foundation for religious thought is Cartesian mind-body dualism,
the idea that a mind can exist independently of a body. This proposition allows for souls, ghosts, spirits, and
Gods, all made of disembodied mind-stuff. Explanations for dualism include
belief in free will and the mutual inhibition of brain areas responsible for
pondering feelings and physics.
Another psychological process related to mysticism is
anthropomorphism, the tendency to apply human-like traits to non-human entities
or concepts. God or the Universe is hearing your prayers. Your laptop meant to
crash during your presentation. Your dog understands you. Anthropomorphism can
be motivated by loneliness or the need to predict and control our environment.
It’s a form of pattern-seeking in which the pattern is another coherent mind.
A third process involved in magical thinking is teleological
reasoning, seeing a purpose (telos, Greek for end) in objects or events. Many
things have a purpose (chairs, weddings, etc.). Many don’t (the Grand Canyon,
hurricanes, etc.), but we sometimes feel like they do. Again, searching for
purposes is a way to understand and ultimately control the world around us.
Behind these three phenomena is mentalizing, the process of
thinking about thoughts. It’s been shown that prayer activates parts of the
brain associated with “theory of mind,” and that people with reduced
mentalizing capabilities - think autism or something related - are less
religious. Why think about the mind of God if minds don’t interest you in the
first place?
In their study, Willard and Norenzayan measured these
tendencies among a group of UBC undergrads and a group of American adults, and
also measured belief in God, the paranormal, and purpose in life.
Dualism was measured using a scale that avoided religious
content; subjects rated agreement with statements such as “The ‘self’ I
introspect about controls both the mind and the brain.” The anthropomorphism
scale used questions including “To what extent does the ocean have
consciousness?” For teleology, subjects rated the accuracy of sentences such as
“The sun makes light so that plants can photosynthesize.” And for mentalizing
they took the Empathy Quotient scale: “I am good at predicting how someone will
feel,” etc.
The measure of belief in God had three items, including “I
believe in God.” Belief in life’s purpose was also measured with three items,
including “Things in my life happen for a reason.” And for belief in the
paranormal they used a version of the Paranormal Belief Scale that left out
subscales for religiosity (to avoid confounds) and extraordinary life forms
(the abominable snowman may not be real but neither is he supernatural). They
retained the subscales for belief in psi (telekinesis and telepathy),
witchcraft, superstition, spiritualism (out-of-body experiences, reincarnation,
speaking with the dead), and precognition (astrology and psychics). For
Americans, the researchers also measured cultural exposure to religion using
statistics on church attendance in their area.
www.psychologytoday.com |
I know, that looks messy, but I've got the "preliminary summary" also:
[W]e have found that individual differences in mentalizing tendencies encouraged mind-body dualism, teleology, and anthropomorphism (albeit, weakly); dualism, and to a lesser extent teleology in turn led to belief in God, belief in paranormal events, and belief in life having an underlying and possibly transcendental purpose. … Anthropomorphic tendencies failed to predict belief in God, but predicted paranormal belief, and to a much lesser extent, belief that life has a purpose.
They also tested a statistical model in which mentalizing
led to belief in God, the paranormal, and life’s purpose, which then led to
dualism, anthropomorphism, and teleology, but this model did not fit the data
well.
The proportion of religious adherents in a respondent’s
county also predicted belief in God, but not dualism or teleology, indicating
that culture and cognitive biases each promote religiosity on their own,
although they probably interact. Local church attendance actually appeared to
reduce anthropomorphism. The researchers speculate that Christianity’s history
of denouncing animism as idolatry may suppress anthropomorphism in some people.
Dualism
Teleology
Anthropomorphism
Anthropomorphism could lead to paranormal belief if you see
the world as alive and receptive to your thoughts or spells, or predictable
through astrology. It might lead to belief in life’s purpose if one sees the
whole world as conspiring to help or harm you. “Anthropomorphism of ‘life’ or
‘the universe’ shouldn’t be any different from anthropomorphizing the ocean,
albeit a little bit more abstract,” Willard tells me. “Life has intentions for
you.” Anthropomorphism does not increase belief in God, however. Somehow seeing
the world as alive doesn’t translate into conceiving of one central personality
pulling all the strings.
Interestingly, belief in God strongly predicted a sense of
life’s purpose (more than the cognitive biases did), but a sense of life’s
purpose did not predict belief in God. I’m still trying to figure that one out.
It could be a mere artifact: Willard and Norenzayan note that the entire study
is correlational, and that demonstrating causality conclusively will require
more work.
Take another look at the diagram above. It’s worth noting
that at the entrance of that maze of boxes and lines haunted with ghosts and
witches and talking trees is one simple item: mentalizing. Which means that if
you’re a fully developed human, with an understanding that minds exist, then
through one path or another you’re probably going to end up in magic-land.
What did you guys think of this post? How does your mind perceive different things in the world? Let me know in the comments, and I'll see you tomorrow.
Buh-bye.
Comments
Post a Comment